© Copyright 2020 We Are Not SAM
Read the science - We Are Not SAM
261
page-template,page-template-full_width,page-template-full_width-php,page,page-id-261,bridge-core-2.5.6,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,side_area_uncovered_from_content,footer_responsive_adv,qode-content-sidebar-responsive,qode-theme-ver-24.2,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_top,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-6.4.2,vc_responsive
 

Read the science

Now is the time to understand the alarming reality of our current crisis and consequence of technology addiction. Wireless Radiation effects Human Health – there is NO DEBATE.

There are more than 2,000 scientific studies conducted by independent researchers from around the world concerning the biological effects of wireless radiation.

 

Here we present some of the most relevant:

I. Flaws with the SAM certification process

The only thing real about SAM, is the devastating health effects related to a rigged test

 

  1. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  2. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  3. Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users
  4. Microwave emissions from cell phones exceed safety limits in Europe and the US when touching the body
  5. Erroneous Comments Submitted to the FCC on Proposed Cellphone Radiation Standards and Testing by CTIA
  6. Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.
  7. Some present problems and proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.
  8. Inaccuracies of a plastic “pinna” SAM for SAR testing of cellular telephones against IEEE and ICNIRP safety guidelines
  9. Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models
  10. Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning
  11. Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users
  12. Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body
  13. Children Are More Exposed to Radiofrequency Energy From Mobile Telephones Than Adults

 

II. Why children are more exposed than adults

What most people do not know (because industry don’t want you to), is that mobile phones can also be certified for safety using a computer algorithm called FDTD. This method is currently the only certification process to include children. These independent studies prove that when testing is done using FDTD, mobile phones do not qualify as safe for children.

 

  1. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  2. Dosimetric Simulations of brain absorption of mobile phone radiation- the relationship between psSAR and age
  3. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  4. SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation
  5. A comparison of foetal SAR in three sets of pregnant female models
  6. Quantification of RF-Exposure of the fetus using anatomical CAD-models in three different gestational stages
  7. Novel monopole antenna on a single AMC cell for low SAR
  8. Thermophysiological responses of human volunteers to whole body RF exposure at 220 MHz
  9. Experimental analysis of HSP 90 and 70 in-vivo changes induced in the thyroid by exposure to microwave electromagnetic fields
  10. Effect of high SARs produced by cell phone like radiofrequency fields on mollusk single neuron
  11. Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz
  12. Numerical evaluation of human exposure to WiMax patch antenna in tablet or laptop
  13. Whole-body-averaged SAR from 50 MHz to 4 GHz in the University of Florida child voxel phantoms
  14. SAR calculations from 20 MHz to 6 GHz in the University of Florida newborn voxel phantom and their implications for dosimetry
  15. Assessment of the computational uncertainty of temperature rise and SAR in the eyes and brain under far-field exposure from 1 to 10 GHz
  16. Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz
  17. Electromagnetic absorption in the head of adults and children due to mobile phone operation close to the head
  18. On the effects of straight metallic jewellery on the specific absorption rates resulting from face-illuminating radio communication devices at popular cellular frequencies
  19. Investigation on blood-brain barrier permeability and collagen synthesis under radiofrequency radiation exposure and SAR simulations of adult and child head
  20. Effect of high SARs produced by cell phone like radiofrequency fields on mollusk single neuron

 

III. Research the Corruption

Manufacturers are corrupt. See for yourself.

 

  1. Background and Facts Documenting PhoneGate and Our Call for Congressional Action
  2. ORSAA take on FCC
  3. World Health Organisation, Radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack
  4. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection: Conflicts of interest, corporate capture and the push for 5G
  5. Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation
  6. Radiation protection in conflict with Science
  7. Biological Effects of Low-intensity Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation – Time for a Paradigm Shift in Regulation of Public Exposure
  8. Biological effects of low-intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation – time for a paradigm shift in regulation of public exposure.
  9. Corporate Ties That Bind: An Examination of Corporate Manipulation and Vested Interest in Public Health
  10. The Procrustean Approach – Setting Exposure Standards for Telecommunications Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation. An examination of the manipulation of telecommunications standards by political, military, and industrial vested interests Wollongong University.
  11. Exposure and Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should Be Reassessed

 

IV. 5G Effects

Want to know why the industry refuse to do a safety test? Read below.

 

  1. Published Scientific Research on 5G, 4G Small Cells, Wireless Radiation and Health
  2. Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation
  3. Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions
  4. Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health
  5. Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz
  6. 5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications 
  7. Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications
  8. 5G Wireless Deployment and Health Risks: Time for a Medical Discussion in Australia and New Zealand
  9. 5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects – A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz
  10. Serious Safety Concerns about 5G Wireless Deployment in Australia and New Zealand.
  11. 5G and the IOT: Scientific Overview of Human Health Risks
  12. 5G and the Internet of Things
  13. Building science and radiofrequency radiation: What makes smart and healthy buildings
  14. Human skin as arrays of helical antennas in the millimeter and submillimeter wave range.
  15. Millimetre waves or extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields in the environment: what are their effects on bacteria?
  16. The human skin as a sub-THz receiver – Does 5G pose a danger to it or not?
  17. Cluster of testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand-held radar
  18. Small Cells, Cell Towers, Wireless Facilities and Health -Letters From Experts on The Impact of Wireless Antennas on Public Health
  19. Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink
  20. The Human body and Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication Systems: Interactions and Implications
  21. State of knowledge on biological effects at 40–60 GHz
  22. Review Article: Effects of millimeter waves radiation on cell membrane

 

V. Effects on fetal and newborn development and children

Mothers should not use a mobile phone during pregnancy. It is not safe for children to use mobile phones on a wireless network. Aeroplane mode and hardwired is the only safe option.

 

  1. Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development
  2. Childhood brain tumour risk and its association with wireless phones: a commentary
  3. Radiofrequency exposure in young and old: different sensitivities in light of age-relevant natural differences.
  4. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  5. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  6. Yes the children are more exposed to radiofrequency energy from mobile telephones than adults
  7. SAR simulations of EMF exposure due to tablet operation close to the user’s body
  8. Use of mobile phone during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion
  9. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy, pregnancy duration and fetal growth in four birth cohorts
  10. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields
  11. Minimize health risks from electronic devices
  12. Use of wireless telephones and self-reported health symptoms: a population-based study among Swedish adolescents aged 15–19 years
  13. The effect of exposure of rats during prenatal period to radiation spreading from mobile phones on renal development
  14. Autism-relevant social abnormalities in mice exposed perinatally to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields
  15. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link
  16. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children
  17. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study
  18. Numerical evaluation of human exposure to WiMax patch antenna in tablet or laptop
  19. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  20. International policy and advisory response regarding children’s exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)

 

 

VI. The danger of Wireless Radiation in schools

Fiber optics connection need to be in every classroom and in every home.

 

  1.  Children and Electromagnetic Radiation in Schools
  2. Mobile Phone Base Station Tower Settings Adjacent to School Buildings: Impact on Students’ Cognitive Health
  3. Screen-centred schools: The new wild west
  4. Measurements of Radiofrequency Radiation with a Body-Borne Exposimeter in Swedish Schools with Wi-Fi
  5. Radiofrequency exposure in young and old: different sensitivities in light of age-relevant natural differences
  6. Radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures in kindergarten children

 

 

VII. Effects on DNA / Genetic Damage

Well documented evidence is available.

 

  1. A cross-sectional case control study on genetic damage in individuals residing in the vicinity of a mobile phone base station.
  2. Comparing DNA damage induced by mobile telephony and other types of man-made electromagnetic fields.
  3. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations.
  4. Electromagnetic noise inhibits radiofrequency radiation-induced DNA damage and reactive oxygen species increase in human lens epithelial cells
  5. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation
  6. Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  7. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations
  8. Gene and Protein Expression Following Exposure to Radiofrequency Fields from Mobile Phones.
  9. Gene Expression Changes in the Skin of Rats Induced by Prolonged 35 GHz Millimeter-Wave Exposure.

 

 

VIII. Effects on Fertility

Men should never keep a mobile phone in a front pants pocket.  Women (especially if pregnant), should never have a wireless phone anywhere near her abdomen.

 

  1. Effect of mobile telephones on sperm quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  2. The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation on sperm function
  3. Effect of long-term exposure of 2.4 GHz radiofrequency radiation emitted from Wi-Fi equipment on testes functions
  4. Effects of prenatal exposure to a 900 MHz electromagnetic field on 60-day-old rat testis and epididymal sperm quality
  5. Effects of cellular phone emissions on sperm motility in rats
  6. Microwave Exposure Affecting Reproductive System in Male Rats
  7. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study
  8. Long-Term Exposure to 4G Smartphone Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation Diminished Male Reproductive Portential by Directly Disrupting Spck3-MMP2-BTB Axis in the Testes of Adult Rats. 
  9. Effect of electromagnetic field exposure on the reproductive system

 

IX. Electromagnetic Sensitivity

As a matter of urgency, governments worldwide should install shielding to reduce electromagnetic sensitivity.

 

  1. Electrohypersensitivity as a Newly Identified and Characterized Neurologic Pathological Disorder: How to Diagnose, Treat, and Prevent It
  2. Common symptoms of EHS include headaches, cognitive difficulties, sleep problems, dizziness, depression, fatigue, skin rashes, tinnitus and flu-like symptoms
  3. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity-an increasing challenge to the medical profession
  4. The Medical Perspective on Environmental Sensitivities
  5. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire
  6. Aspects of studies on the functional impairment electrohypersensitivity
  7. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
  8. The microwave syndrome or electro-hypersensitivity: historical background Rev Environ Health
  9. Microwave sickness: a reappraisal
  10. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2015 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses
  11. Metabolic and genetic screening of EHS subjects
  12. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies

 

 

X. Neurological/Cognitive Effects

Are we reaching a tipping point?

 

  1. Are Rises in Electro-Magnetic Field in The Human Environment, Interacting with Multiple Environmental Pollutions, The Tripping Point for Increases in Neurological Deaths in the Western World?
  2. Neurological effects of radiofrequency radiation
  3. Early-Life Exposure to Pulsed LTE Radiofrequency Fields Causes Persistent Changes in Activity and Behavior in C57BL/6 J Mice.
  4. Effect of 1800-2100 MHz Electromagnetic Radiation on Learning-Memory and Hippocampal Morphology in Swiss Albino Mice

 

XI. Oxidative Stress

This ought to ring alarm bells.

 

  1. Exposure to 1800 MHz radiofrequency radiation induces oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA in primary cultured neurons
  2. Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation
  3. 2.45 GHz Microwave Irradiation Adversely Affects Reproductive Function in Male Mouse, Mus musculus by Inducing Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress
  4. The antioxidant effect of Green Tea Mega EGCG against electromagnetic radiation-induced oxidative stress in the hippocampus and striatum of rats

 

 

XII. Brain tumors

Brain tumors are the most common cancer from mobile phone use.

 

  1. Association between number of cell phone contracts and brain tumor incidence in nineteen U.S. States
  2. Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries
  3. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study
  4. Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use
  5. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents
  6. On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation
  7. Decreased survival of glioma patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile and cordless phones
  8. Connection between Cell Phone use, p53 Gene Expression in Different Zones of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Survival Prognoses.
  9.  Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study
  10. Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009.
  11. Case-control study on occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and glioma risk
  12. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation
  13. NPT Technical Report On The Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies In Hsd: Sprague Dawley Rats Exposed To Whole-Body Radio Frequency Radiation At A Frequency (900 MHz) And Modulations (GSM And CDMA) Used Cell Phones
  14. Information and explanations about the National Toxicology Programme Study
  15. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission

 

 

XIII. Tumors of the Meninges (Meningioma), surrounds the brain and spinal cord

Why are these cancers on the rise?

 

  1. Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries
  2. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents 
  3. Meningioma patients diagnosed 2007-2009 and the association with use of mobile and cordless phones: a case-control study
  4. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study
  5. Pooled analysis of Swedish case-control studies during 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 on meningioma risk associated with the use of mobile and cordless phones.

 

 

XIV. Hearing Nerve Tumor (vestibular Schwannoma; acoustic neuroma)

Previously very rare.  Once diagnosed the hearing nerve must be cut out where the tumor is located, often resulting in deafness and effects hearing.  Because the facial nerve wraps around the hearing nerve, the surgeon can accidently cut the facial nerve resulting in facial paralysis.

 

  1. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents.
  2. Pooled analysis of case-control studies on acoustic neuroma diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and use of mobile and cordless phone use
  3. A case-case study of mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk in Japan
  4. Association between vestibular schwannomas and mobile phone use
  5. Long-term mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk

 

 

XV. Parotid Gland Cancer (a large salivary gland in the cheeks)

Previously, very, very rare, now semi-common.

 

  1. The influence of handheld mobile phones on human parotid gland secretion 
  2. Risk of Parotid Malignant Tumors in Israel (1970–2006)
  3. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents  
  4. Does cell phone use increase the chances of parotid gland tumor development? A systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. Incidence trends of malignant parotid gland tumor in Swedish and Nordic adults 1970 to 2009

 

 

XVI. Eye Cancer (uveal melanoma, choroid tumor, ocular melanoma)

Can you see the issue staring you in the face right now?

 

  1. The Possible Role of Radiofrequency Radiation in the Development of Uveal Melanoma 
  2. Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and sex-differential risk of uveal melanoma
  3. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents 
  4. Tumor-specific frequencies and ocular melanoma

 

 

XVII. Cancers of the Breast (male and female)

Don’t ever store your mobile phone in your bra or shirt pocket.

 

  1. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school
  2. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents 
  3. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones.
  4. Electromagnetic field exposure and male breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 18 studies 

 

XVIII. Melanoma of the Skin

Previously from sunburn, now also from mobile phone use.

 

  1. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school
  2. Case-control study on the use of mobile and cordless phones and the risk for malignant melanoma in the head and neck region.
  3. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents 

 

XIX. Leukemia

Leukemia from mobile phone use is now growing.

 

  1. Risk factors for leukemia in Thailand
  2. A case-control study of risk of leukaemia in relation to mobile phone use
  3. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents

 

XX. Thyroid Cancer (male and female)

Recently recognized that Thyroid cancer is related to mobile phone use.  Females have substantially higher risk than men.

 

  1. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school 
  2. Increasing incidence of thyroid cancer in the Nordic countries with main focus on Swedish data 
  3. Trends in Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 1974-2013
  4. Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut

 

XXI. Multiple Cancers

The science clearly states, mobile phones can cause cancer.

 

  1. Report on a Cancer Cluster in an Antenna Ranges Facility
  2. A new electromagnetic exposure metric: high frequency voltage transients associated with increased cancer incidence in teachers in a California school
  3. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents 
  4. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumours in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission
  5. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation

 

XXII. Blood Brain Barrier

There is no question. Wireless radiation opens up the blood brain barrier.

 

  1. Effects of radiofrequency radiation exposure on blood-brain barrier permeability in male and female rats
  2. Increased blood-brain barrier permeability in mammalian brain 7 days after exposure to the radiation from a GSM-900 mobile phone
  3. Reliable disease biomarkers characterizing and identifying electrohypersensitivity and multiple chemical sensitivity as two etiopathogenic aspects of a unique pathological disorder
  4. Nonthermal GSM RF and ELF EMF effects upon rat BBB permeability
  5. The role of electromagnetic fields in neurological disorders

 

 

XXIII. Health effects of non-ionising radiation – General

Biologically all radiation is carcinogenic.  Historically, physicists learned that only ionizing radiation caused cancer.  Now all radiation is known to be a carcinogen.

 

  1. Background and Facts Documenting PhoneGate and Our Call for Congressional Action
  2. Joint actions of environmental nonionizing electromagnetic fields and chemical pollution in cancer promotion
  3. Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays
  4. Base stations and wireless networks: exposures and health consequences: proceedings, International Workshop on Base Stations and Wireless Networks
  5. Extra-low-frequency magnetic fields alter cancer cells through metabolic restriction. 
  6. Can non-ionising radiation cause cancer?
  7. Most cancer in firefighters is due to radio-frequency radiation exposure not inhaled carcinogens. 
  8. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  9. Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz 
  10. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study.
  11. Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009
  12. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones
  13. Tumour promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans
  14. Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
  15. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group: Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  16. A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation
  17. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors
  18. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact
  19. The implications of non-linear biological oscillations on human electrophysiology for electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity
  20. US District Judge William Alsup ordered Apple on Thursday July16, 2020 to deliver its correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to consumers who claim that iPhones emit dangerous levels of radiation
  21. Swiss Re classifies 5G as “High” impact emerging risk in white paper

 

 

XXIV. Databases

Cancer databases are very important, particular because cancer incidence rates are increasing.

 

  1. Bioinitiative Report 2019A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) with over 900 pages of studies
  2. Physicians for Safe Technology
  3. Environmental Health Trust
  4. The International EMF Scientist AppealServes as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organisations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.
  5. Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA) research
  6. EMF Portal Research Literature
  7. EMFACTS
  8. Most recent Independent Science on the Effect of Wireless Radiation on Human Health

Flaws with the SAM certification process

The only thing real about SAM, is the devastating health effects related to a rigged test

 

 

  1. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  2. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  3. Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users
  4. Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and
    the US When Touching the Body
  5. Microwave emissions from cell phones exceed safety limits in Europe and the US when touching the body
  6. Erroneous Comments Submitted to the FCC on Proposed Cellphone Radiation Standards and Testing by CTIA
  7. Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.
  8. Some present problems and proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz.
  9. Inaccuracies of a plastic “pinna” SAM for SAR testing of cellular telephones against IEEE and ICNIRP safety guidelines
  10. Review and standardization of cell phone exposure calculations using the SAM phantom and anatomically correct head models
  11. Dosimetric comparison of the specific anthropomorphic mannequin (SAM) to 14 anatomical head models using a novel definition for the mobile phone positioning
  12. Age-dependent tissue-specific exposure of cell phone users
  13. Microwave Emissions From Cell Phones Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and the US When Touching the Body
  14. Children Are More Exposed to Radiofrequency Energy From Mobile Telephones Than Adults

Why children are more exposed than adults

What most people do not know (because industry don’t want you to), is that mobile phones can also be certified for safety using a computer algorithm called FDTD. This method is currently the only certification process to include children. These independent studies prove that when testing is done using FDTD, mobile phones do not qualify as safe for children.

 

  1. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  2. Dosimetric Simulations of brain absorption of mobile phone radiation- the relationship between psSAR and age
  3. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  4. SAR in the mother and foetus for RF plane wave irradiation
  5. A comparison of foetal SAR in three sets of pregnant female models
  6. Quantification of RF-Exposure of the fetus using anatomical CAD-models in three different gestational stages
  7. Novel monopole antenna on a single AMC cell for low SAR
  8. Thermophysiological responses of human volunteers to whole body RF exposure at 220 MHz
  9. Experimental analysis of HSP 90 and 70 in-vivo changes induced in the thyroid by exposure to microwave electromagnetic fields
  10. Effect of high SARs produced by cell phone like radiofrequency fields on mollusk single neuron
  11. Some present problems and a proposed experimental phantom for SAR compliance testing of cellular telephones at 835 and 1900 MHz
  12. Numerical evaluation of human exposure to WiMax patch antenna in tablet or laptop
  13. Whole-body-averaged SAR from 50 MHz to 4 GHz in the University of Florida child voxel phantoms
  14. SAR calculations from 20 MHz to 6 GHz in the University of Florida newborn voxel phantom and their implications for dosimetry
  15. Assessment of the computational uncertainty of temperature rise and SAR in the eyes and brain under far-field exposure from 1 to 10 GHz
  16. Assessment of induced SAR in children exposed to electromagnetic plane waves between 10 MHz and 5.6 GHz
  17. Electromagnetic absorption in the head of adults and children due to mobile phone operation close to the head
  18. On the effects of straight metallic jewellery on the specific absorption rates resulting from face-illuminating radio communication devices at popular cellular frequencies
  19. Investigation on blood-brain barrier permeability and collagen synthesis under radiofrequency radiation exposure and SAR simulations of adult and child head
  20. Effect of high SARs produced by cell phone like radiofrequency fields on mollusk single neuron

5G Effects

Want to know why the industry refuse to do a safety test? Read below.

 

    1. Published Scientific Research on 5G, 4G Small Cells, Wireless Radiation and Health
    2. Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation
    3. Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions
    4. Effects of 5G wireless communication on human health
    5. Exposure of Insects to Radio-Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from 2 to 120 GHz
    6. 5G wireless telecommunications expansion: Public health and environmental implications 
    7. Towards 5G communication systems: Are there health implications
    8. 5G Wireless Deployment and Health Risks: Time for a Medical Discussion in Australia and New Zealand
    9. 5G Wireless Communication and Health Effects – A Pragmatic Review Based on Available Studies Regarding 6 to 100 GHz
    10. Serious Safety Concerns about 5G Wireless Deployment in Australia and New Zealand.
    11. 5G and the IOT: Scientific Overview of Human Health Risks
    12. 5G and the Internet of Things
    13. Building science and radiofrequency radiation: What makes smart and healthy buildings
    14. Human skin as arrays of helical antennas in the millimeter and submillimeter wave range.
    15. Millimetre waves or extremely high frequency electromagnetic fields in the environment: what are their effects on bacteria?
    16. The human skin as a sub-THz receiver – Does 5G pose a danger to it or not?
    17. Cluster of testicular cancer in police officers exposed to hand-held radar
    18. Small Cells, Cell Towers, Wireless Facilities and Health -Letters From Experts on The Impact of Wireless Antennas on Public Health
    19. Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink
    20. The Human body and Millimeter-Wave Wireless Communication Systems: Interactions and Implications
    21. State of knowledge on biological effects at 40–60 GHz
    22. Review Article: Effects of millimeter waves radiation on cell membrane

Effects on fetal and newborn development and children

Mothers should not use a mobile phone during pregnancy. It is not safe for children to use mobile phones on a wireless network. Aeroplane mode and hardwired is the only safe option.

 

  1. Electromagnetic Fields, Pulsed Radiofrequency Radiation, and Epigenetics: How Wireless Technologies May Affect Childhood Development
  2. Childhood brain tumour risk and its association with wireless phones: a commentary
  3. Radiofrequency exposure in young and old: different sensitivities in light of age-relevant natural differences.
  4. Exposure limits: the underestimation of absorbed cell phone radiation, especially in children
  5. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  6. Yes the children are more exposed to radiofrequency energy from mobile telephones than adults
  7. SAR simulations of EMF exposure due to tablet operation close to the user’s body
  8. Use of mobile phone during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion
  9. Maternal cell phone use during pregnancy, pregnancy duration and fetal growth in four birth cohorts
  10. The sensitivity of children to electromagnetic fields
  11. Minimize health risks from electronic devices
  12. Use of wireless telephones and self-reported health symptoms: a population-based study among Swedish adolescents aged 15–19 years
  13. The effect of exposure of rats during prenatal period to radiation spreading from mobile phones on renal development
  14. Autism-relevant social abnormalities in mice exposed perinatally to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields
  15. Autism and EMF? Plausibility of a pathophysiological link
  16. Prenatal and postnatal exposure to cell phone use and behavioral problems in children
  17. Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study
  18. Numerical evaluation of human exposure to WiMax patch antenna in tablet or laptop
  19. Absorption of wireless radiation in the child versus adult brain and eye from cell phone conversation or virtual reality
  20. International policy and advisory response regarding children’s exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)

 

Brain Tumors

Brain tumors are the most common cancer from mobile phone use.

 

  1. Association between number of cell phone contracts and brain tumor incidence in nineteen U.S. States
  2. Risk of brain tumours in relation to estimated RF dose from mobile phones: results from five Interphone countries
  3. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study
  4. Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use
  5. A sentinel case series of cancer patients with occupational exposures to electromagnetic non-ionizing radiation and other agents
  6. On the association between glioma, wireless phones, heredity and ionising radiation
  7. Decreased survival of glioma patients with astrocytoma grade IV (glioblastoma multiforme) associated with long-term use of mobile and cordless phones
  8. Connection between Cell Phone use, p53 Gene Expression in Different Zones of Glioblastoma Multiforme and Survival Prognoses.
  9.  Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study
  10. Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009.
  11. Case-control study on occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields and glioma risk
  12. Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association or Causation
  13. NPT Technical Report On The Toxicology & Carcinogenesis Studies In Hsd: Sprague Dawley Rats Exposed To Whole-Body Radio Frequency Radiation At A Frequency (900 MHz) And Modulations (GSM And CDMA) Used Cell Phones
  14. Information and explanations about the National Toxicology Programme Study
  15. Report of final results regarding brain and heart tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats exposed from prenatal life until natural death to mobile phone radiofrequency field representative of a 1.8 GHz GSM base station environmental emission

Hearing Nerve Tumor (vestibular Schwannoma; acoustic neuroma)

Health effects of non-ionising radiation – General

Biologically all radiation is carcinogenic.  Historically, physicists learned that only ionizing radiation caused cancer.  Now all radiation is known to be a carcinogen.

 

  1. Background and Facts Documenting PhoneGate and Our Call for Congressional Action
  2. Joint actions of environmental nonionizing electromagnetic fields and chemical pollution in cancer promotion
  3. Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays
  4. Base stations and wireless networks: exposures and health consequences: proceedings, International Workshop on Base Stations and Wireless Networks
  5. Extra-low-frequency magnetic fields alter cancer cells through metabolic restriction. 
  6. Can non-ionising radiation cause cancer?
  7. Most cancer in firefighters is due to radio-frequency radiation exposure not inhaled carcinogens. 
  8. Cancer epidemiology update, following the 2011 IARC evaluation of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  9. Comments on the US National Toxicology Program technical reports on toxicology and carcinogenesis study in rats exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 900 MHz and in mice exposed to whole-body radiofrequency radiation at 1,900 MHz 
  10. Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study.
  11. Mobile phone and cordless phone use and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997-2003 and 2007-2009
  12. Multifocal Breast Cancer in Young Women with Prolonged Contact between Their Breasts and Their Cellular Phones
  13. Tumour promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans
  14. Risks to Health and Well-Being From Radio-Frequency Radiation Emitted by Cell Phones and Other Wireless Devices
  15. WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group: Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
  16. A novel database of bio-effects from non-ionizing radiation
  17. Cardiovascular disease: Time to identify emerging environmental risk factors
  18. Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact
  19. The implications of non-linear biological oscillations on human electrophysiology for electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity
  20. US District Judge William Alsup ordered Apple on Thursday July16, 2020 to deliver its correspondence with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to consumers who claim that iPhones emit dangerous levels of radiation
  21. Swiss Re classifies 5G as “High” impact emerging risk in white paper

Databases

Cancer databases are very important, particular because cancer incidence rates are increasing.

 

  1. Bioinitiative Report 2019A Rationale for Biologically-based Public Exposure Standards for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF) with over 900 pages of studies
  2. Physicians for Safe Technology
  3. Environmental Health Trust
  4. The International EMF Scientist AppealServes as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organisations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.
  5. Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA) research
  6. EMF Portal Research Literature
  7. EMFACTS
  8. Most recent Independent Science on the Effect of Wireless Radiation on Human Health
Processing...
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.
Subscribe to avoid censorship
ErrorHere