“For people who have used these devices for 10 years or longer, and when they are used mainly on one side of the head, the risk of malignant brain tumor is doubled for adults and is even higher for persons with first use before the age of 20 years.”

Dr. Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Brain tumor specialist, works as both an oncologist and a researcher at Orebro University Hospital in Sweden, expert on cell phones and brain tumors.

“I have been researching and warning about the health effects of mobile devices for more than 40 years. To test mobile phone safety on a plastic dummy filled with liquid, without skin or organs, is absolutely ludicrous. Mobile devices are negatively impacting not just people, but animals, plants, and bacteria. I encourage everyone to get behind the We Are Not SAM campaign!”

Olle Johansson, Associate Professor, retired Head of the Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute.

“Scientists agree that SAM does not have the electrical properties of a human brain. The fact is women, children and the elderly are not considered nor protected by this testing method. Our research shows that a 10 year old absorbs 153% more radiation than SAM. This SAM certification process is the reason why millions of new cell phones are allowed on the market each year. This test is dangerously outdated – it’s time for new safety standards.”

Om P. Gandhi, Emeritus Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering with the University of Utah, taught courses on biological effects of antennas, RF and microwave electromagnetic fields for over 50 years.

“Phones are tested on a plastic dummy that has no reproductive organs. Thousands of studies unequivocally show that current levels of microwave radiation from phones and other wireless devices can cause sterility. Your cell phone can send a microwave radiating handshake to the tower 900 times a minute. Nobody should accept that handshake.”

Dr Devra Davis, Epidemiologist and President of the Environmental Health Trust.

“Wireless radiation has biological effects, period. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans we have clear evidence of cancer now. There is no question.”

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, MD Integrative and Functional Medicine Physician, Clinical expertise in environmental intolerance including Microwave Sickness.

“Allowing 5G technology to be used without proving its safety is reckless in the extreme.”

Prof. Trevor Marshall, Director of Autoimmunity Research Foundation, California, US.

“There is a lack of clear labelling on packaging covering risks. Wireless device usage is not risk free as shown by a number of studies linking heavy cell phone usage to specific types of rare brain tumors.”

Dr Julie McCredden, President Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association Inc. (ORSAA).

“We are exposing millions of children to wireless radiation both in our schools and homes every day without any proof of safety. The great majority of regulators work on the premise that until there is concrete scientific evidence that an agent can cause harm, it is assumed safe. Think asbestos and tobacco. This underlying presumption of ‘innocent until proven guilty’ favours the wireless industry, and forces independent scientists to undergo extensive trials and judicial reviews which may take decades before action is taken. This is history repeating, and it is negligent and reckless to the extreme.”

Nicole Bijlsma, CEO & Founder of the Australian College of Environmental Studies, Building Biologist.

“I consider society’s reckless pursuit of wireless tech to be the biggest threat to life on Earth. Filling our planetary atmosphere with wireless signals (microwave radiation) destroys nature. Mounting evidence indicates catastrophic effects on all forms of life unless we put an end to this madness. Industry is testing mobile devices for safety on a plastic dummy, and with the 5G network, they are not testing at all. We still have a small window of opportunity to change this suicidal trajectory”.

Dr. Priyanka Bandara, Researcher at Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association (ORSAA), Scientific Advisor to Environmental Health Trust, Member of the Phonegate Alert Board.

“Big Tech have used a rigged test to release a technology that we now know causes biological harm. But more than that, they have us addicted to our devices, and now with 5G they have become a tool for surveillance. Make no mistake, surveillance has become a weapon of obedience. It’s now or never. We Are Not Sam.”

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, Founder, Chairman and Chief Legal Counsel for Children’s Health Defense.

“There is overwhelming evidence that wireless radiation is carcinogenic to humans. We are not doing a good enough job in protecting ourselves, nor our children from this carcinogen. There is very compelling scientific justification to have warning labels on all wireless devices. As a start, we need to take them out of the hands of our children.”

L. Lloyd Morgan, International EMF Alliance Co-founder, Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States Director, Senior Science Fellow at the Environmental Health Trust.

“A society that doesn’t protect its children doesn’t have a future, and we are doing a poor job protecting children from wireless radiation.”

Dr. Magda Havas, PhD Associate Professor, Environment & Resource Studies, Trent University, Canada, expert in radiofrequency radiation.

“5G is going to require a transmitter for every three to ten houses, so we’re talking about a small cell tower placed in front of your home… That should alarm people.”

Kevin Mottus, President of US Brain Tumor Association.

“The Report reviewed over 1800 scientific studies showing damage to DNA and genes, effects on memory, learning, behavior, attention, sleep disruption and cancer. New safety standards are urgently needed for protection against EMF and wireless exposures that now appear everywhere in daily life.”

The BioInitiative Report 2012 (report updated 2014-2020)- a rationale for biologically-based exposure standards for low intensity Electromagnetic radiation.

“The SAM dummy includes a plastic spacer to represent the “ear “. This artificially separates the cell phone’s radiating antenna from the brain by as much as 10 millimeters thus lowering SAM’s radiation absorption by almost 200%. It is important that safety compliance testing be done under realistic conditions of actual use of cell phones by present day users. This should include telephones held at 0 millimeter spacing on the body, without a tapered plastic spacer.”

Om P. Gandhi, Emeritus Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering with the University of Utah, taught courses on biological effects of antennas, RF and microwave electromagnetic fields for over 50 years.

“Putting in tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has got to be about the stupidest idea anyone has had in the history of the world.” 

Dr. Martin Pall, Professor of Biochemistry and Medical Science, Washington University